Changes

During [[Computer Chess Forums|forum]] discussions about early DanChess versions and the definition of [[Clones:Category:Clone|clones]] <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=45342 crafty clone?] by [[Daniel Shawul]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], November 28, 2003</ref>, [[Robert Hyatt]] pointed out DanChess had various pre-initialized tables as used in [[Crafty]] and a quite similar [[SEE - The Swap Algorithm|SEE swap]] implementation <ref>[https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=349253 Re: definition of clones: Danchess an Crafty] by [[Robert Hyatt]], [[CCC]], February 15, 2004</ref>, the latter also mentioned as extremely similar by [[Dann Corbit]], who as a kind of ombudsman inspected DanChess' source code concluding it "clean" otherwise, and disagreed with Hyatt about both the spirit and the extent of whether or not DanChess is a Crafty clone <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=46486&p=176048#p176025 Re: WBEC Ridderkerk new results] by [[Dann Corbit]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], February 15, 2004</ref>. However, all controversial tracks were later removed in subsequent versions, version 1.04 was published as open source <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=46673 DanChess with source code] by [[Dann Corbit]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], March 01, 2004</ref>.