25,161
edits
Changes
no edit summary
==Jaap van den Herik==
[[Jaap van den Herik]] on Gunda-1 in ''Augmented Ideas'', Editorial [[ICGA Journal#20_1|ICCA Journal]], March 1997 <ref>[[Jaap van den Herik]] ('''1997'''). ''Augmentes Ideas''. Editorial [[ICGA Journal#20_1|ICCA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1]]</ref> , where he was misinformed about [[Rajah]] by [[Valavan Manohararajah]] <ref>[httphttps://groups.google.com/groupd/msg/rec.games.chess.computer/browse_frm/threadNjJdS3uw7qQ/36325d4b7bb0eea4# L7aYTdKG31AJ Misinformation about RAJAH in the ICCA] by [[Valavan Manohararajah]], [[Computer Chess Forums|rgcc]], April 5, 1997</ref> and later apologized <ref>[httphttps://groups.google.com/groupd/msg/rec.games.chess.computer/msgNjJdS3uw7qQ/47916b5f26aee711 EeeuJl9rkUcJ Re: Misinformation about RAJAH in the ICCA - APOLOGY] by [[Jaap van den Herik]], [[Computer Chess Forums|rgcc]], April 8, 1997</ref> :
In the 14th WMCC (Jakarta, 1996), the Indonesian program [[Gunda-1|GUNDA-1]] participated, and in the 16th Open Dutch Computer-Chess Championship (Leiden, 1996) the program [[Rajah|RAJAH]] was entered. Both programs were based on [[Robert Hyatt|Hyatt's]] world-wide available code of the program [[Crafty|CRAFTY]]. Since both teams gave due credit to CRAFTY as their original source, it is comparable to using ideas from articles while giving appropriate reference. Nevertheless, the question remains to what extent can we prolong the similarity of publications and programs. For articles, we do not allow plagiarism. For algorithms and programs I believe we are in a state of flux. Yet, the researcher who is the originator of the ideas should always be given pride of place.
