Difference between revisions of "DanChess"

From Chessprogramming wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "'''Home * Engines * DanChess''' '''DanChess''',<br/> a chess engine by Daniel Shawul written in C++, compliant to the Chess Engine Communicati...")
 
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
=Controversy=
 
=Controversy=
During [[Computer Chess Forums|forum]] discussions about early DanChess versions and the definition of [[Clones|clones]] <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=45342 crafty clone?] by [[Daniel Shawul]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], November 28, 2003</ref>, [[Robert Hyatt]] pointed out DanChess had various pre-initialized tables as used in [[Crafty]] and a quite similar [[SEE - The Swap Algorithm|SEE swap]] implementation <ref>[https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=349253 Re: definition of clones: Danchess an Crafty] by [[Robert Hyatt]], [[CCC]], February 15, 2004</ref>, the latter also mentioned as extremely similar by [[Dann Corbit]], who as a kind of ombudsman inspected DanChess' source code concluding it "clean" otherwise, and disagreed with Hyatt about both the spirit and the extent of whether or not DanChess is a Crafty clone <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=46486&p=176048#p176025 Re: WBEC Ridderkerk new results] by [[Dann Corbit]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], February 15, 2004</ref>. However, all controversial tracks were later removed in subsequent versions, version 1.04 was published as open source <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=46673 DanChess with source code] by [[Dann Corbit]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], March 01, 2004</ref>.  
+
During [[Computer Chess Forums|forum]] discussions about early DanChess versions and the definition of [[:Category:Clone|clones]] <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=45342 crafty clone?] by [[Daniel Shawul]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], November 28, 2003</ref>, [[Robert Hyatt]] pointed out DanChess had various pre-initialized tables as used in [[Crafty]] and a quite similar [[SEE - The Swap Algorithm|SEE swap]] implementation <ref>[https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=349253 Re: definition of clones: Danchess an Crafty] by [[Robert Hyatt]], [[CCC]], February 15, 2004</ref>, the latter also mentioned as extremely similar by [[Dann Corbit]], who as a kind of ombudsman inspected DanChess' source code concluding it "clean" otherwise, and disagreed with Hyatt about both the spirit and the extent of whether or not DanChess is a Crafty clone <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=46486&p=176048#p176025 Re: WBEC Ridderkerk new results] by [[Dann Corbit]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], February 15, 2004</ref>. However, all controversial tracks were later removed in subsequent versions, version 1.04 was published as open source <ref>[http://www.open-aurec.com/wbforum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=46673 DanChess with source code] by [[Dann Corbit]], [[Computer Chess Forums|Winboard Forum]], March 01, 2004</ref>.  
  
 
=Forum Posts=  
 
=Forum Posts=  

Latest revision as of 11:21, 7 June 2020

Home * Engines * DanChess

DanChess,
a chess engine by Daniel Shawul written in C++, compliant to the Chess Engine Communication Protocol. DanChess uses a hybrid mailbox and bitboards board representation [1] , utilizes attack tables, and is able to probe Nalimov Tablebases. DanChess had its tournament debut in 2005, playing a strong CCT7 [2] , but was soon superseeded by its successor Scorpio [3].

Controversy

During forum discussions about early DanChess versions and the definition of clones [4], Robert Hyatt pointed out DanChess had various pre-initialized tables as used in Crafty and a quite similar SEE swap implementation [5], the latter also mentioned as extremely similar by Dann Corbit, who as a kind of ombudsman inspected DanChess' source code concluding it "clean" otherwise, and disagreed with Hyatt about both the spirit and the extent of whether or not DanChess is a Crafty clone [6]. However, all controversial tracks were later removed in subsequent versions, version 1.04 was published as open source [7].

Forum Posts

External Links

References

Up one level