Difference between revisions of "Behting Study"
GerdIsenberg (talk | contribs) |
GerdIsenberg (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[[Main Page|Home]] * [[Engine Testing]] * [[Test-Positions]] * Behting Study''' | '''[[Main Page|Home]] * [[Engine Testing]] * [[Test-Positions]] * Behting Study''' | ||
| − | The | + | The study by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C4%81rlis_B%C4%93ti%C5%86%C5%A1 Kārlis Bētiņš] (Carl Behting), first published in the magazine [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemia_(newspaper) Bohemia] in 1906 <ref>[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8C%D1%88,_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87#%D0%AD%D1%82%D1%8E%D0%B4%D1%8B Бетиньш, Карлис Карлович - Этюды]</ref>. |
<fentt border="double" style="font-size:24pt">8/8/7p/3KNN1k/2p4p/8/3P2p1/8</fentt> | <fentt border="double" style="font-size:24pt">8/8/7p/3KNN1k/2p4p/8/3P2p1/8</fentt> | ||
| − | 8/8/7p/3KNN1k/2p4p/8/3P2p1/8 w - - | + | 8/8/7p/3KNN1k/2p4p/8/3P2p1/8 w - - ; bm Kc6 |
=Forum Posts= | =Forum Posts= | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
: [https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=259020 Re: Position solved] by [[Roland Pfister]], [[CCC]], October 14, 2002 » [[Patzer]] | : [https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=259020 Re: Position solved] by [[Roland Pfister]], [[CCC]], October 14, 2002 » [[Patzer]] | ||
* [http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=55167 Stockfish 6 is impressive in Behting study] by [[Jouni Uski]], [[CCC]], January 31, 2015 » [[Stockfish]] | * [http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=55167 Stockfish 6 is impressive in Behting study] by [[Jouni Uski]], [[CCC]], January 31, 2015 » [[Stockfish]] | ||
| + | * [https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/13216/is-behting-study-still-beating-computers Is Behting Study Still Beating Computers?], Chess Stack Exchange, January 01, 2016 | ||
=External Links= | =External Links= | ||
* [http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8332 Can we still deceive computers in chess?] by Kiyoshi Takahashi, [[ChessBase|ChessBase News]], July 17, 2012 | * [http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8332 Can we still deceive computers in chess?] by Kiyoshi Takahashi, [[ChessBase|ChessBase News]], July 17, 2012 | ||
| − | * [ | + | * [https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-behting-study-solution-and-a-search-for-cooks The Behting study – solution and a search for cooks], [[ChessBase|ChessBase News]], August 7, 2012 |
| − | * [ | + | * [https://en.chessbase.com/post/john-nunn-the-behting-study-is-sound 'The Behting study is sound'] by [[John Nunn]], [[ChessBase|ChessBase News]], October 05, 2012 |
| + | |||
| + | =References= | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
'''[[Test-Positions|Up one level]]''' | '''[[Test-Positions|Up one level]]''' | ||
Latest revision as of 14:21, 31 October 2018
Home * Engine Testing * Test-Positions * Behting Study
The study by Kārlis Bētiņš (Carl Behting), first published in the magazine Bohemia in 1906 [1].
♟ ♔♘♘ ♚ ♟ ♟ ♙ ♟ |
8/8/7p/3KNN1k/2p4p/8/3P2p1/8 w - - ; bm Kc6
Forum Posts
- well knowned ( or maybe not so knowned ) chess problem from 1906 by Mike Byrne, CCC, October 11, 2002
- Re: CORRECT position for chess problem from 1906 by Mike Byrne, CCC, October 11, 2002
- Re: Position solved by Roland Pfister, CCC, October 14, 2002 » Patzer
- Stockfish 6 is impressive in Behting study by Jouni Uski, CCC, January 31, 2015 » Stockfish
- Is Behting Study Still Beating Computers?, Chess Stack Exchange, January 01, 2016
External Links
- Can we still deceive computers in chess? by Kiyoshi Takahashi, ChessBase News, July 17, 2012
- The Behting study – solution and a search for cooks, ChessBase News, August 7, 2012
- 'The Behting study is sound' by John Nunn, ChessBase News, October 05, 2012
