Bishop versus Knight

Home * Evaluation * of Pieces * Bishop versus Knight

Bishop versus Knight, is an often debated topic of the two pieces of similar relative strengths. Traditional thinking has been that the bishop is slighly better in open positions while the knight is better in closed positions. However, the bishop pair versus knight and bishop or even more versus two knights yields an extra advantage as demonstrated in the winning percentages of the C, D, E rows of several material configurations 1 - 6 in Mark Sturman's table.

=Endgame Considerations= In a minor piece endgame featuring bishop versus knight a couple of special considerations should be taken into account: =Winning Percentages= of the bishop side as given by Mark Sturman, mining a database of over 350,000 games. Only results with at least 50 games have been recorded :
 * bishop becomes stronger if there are pawns on both wings
 * the side with a knight can defend by the means of blockade on the squares that are out of reach for the enemy bishop
 * if the side with a knight has a compact pawn mass, then it should place pawns on the squares controlled by enemy bishop to restrict its mobility.
 * * = Insufficient data

=See also=
 * Bishop Pair
 * Strategic Test Suite

=Publications=
 * Gennady Timoshchenko (1993). Bishop or Knight? ICCA Journal, Vol. 16, No. 4
 * Mark Sturman (1995). Beware The Bishop Pair. Computer Chess Reports, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.58
 * Mark Sturman (1996). Beware the Bishop Pair. ICCA Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2
 * Steve Mayer (1997). Bishop Versus Knight: The verdict. Batsford, amazon.com

=References=

Up one Level